Local governments are increasingly promoting mixed-income housing as a tool for fighting poverty, on the assumption that economic integration gives low-income children a better chance at overcoming poverty. New York City Mayor Bill De Blasio, for instance, has set a target of building 200,000 affordable housing units in the city, and he wants them to be distributed throughout mixed-income and more affluent neighborhoods. “Our goal is really to foster more economically diverse neighborhoods,” Alicia Glen, Deputy Mayor for Housing and Economic Development, told the New York Times.
…….NOTE: POVERTY IS CAUSED BY CHAOTIC FORM OF TRIBALISTIC POLYGAMY THAT CAUSES SEXUAL VIOLENCE, BROKEN ABSENTEE FATHERING, ABANDONED MOTHERS, IMMATURE, ANGRY, LIZARD BRAIN MALES…….
These programs rest on the assumption that mixed-income communities benefit low-income residents. Poorer children might profit from access to better neighborhood schools and facilities; the aspirations of their better-off, more future-oriented peers might rub off on them. Such a housing policy seems especially attractive when you consider that a child born into a low-income neighborhood has a 64 percent chance of moving down the socioeconomic ladder over the course of his life. Low-income neighborhoods suffer from higher crime rates, lower educational attainment, and poorer health; recent research even found a connectionbetween growing up in a poor neighborhood and PTSD.
NOTE: THE SLOTH OF POVERTY IS CAUSED BY AN ABSENSE OF POWER MONOGAMY – THE FABLED PROTESTANT WORK ETHIC IS IN REALITY THE FABLED EXCEPTIONALIST POWER MONOGAMY WORK ETHIC
But a new paper in the Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry suggests that mixed-income housing has its own problems, too.
NOTE: ALL THE TRIBALISTIC VIOLENCE OF POLYGAMY IS BASED ON THE DEATH STRUGGLE FOR SEXUAL SUPREMACISM
A team of researchers at Duke University found that low-income boys in mixed-income communities are more likely than their peers in uniformly poor neighborhoods to engage in anti-social behavior such as fighting, lying, and stealing. The greater the economic inequality in the neighborhood, the worse the low-income boys in this study fared.
NOTE: THE LIZARD BRAIN IMMATURE YOUTHS OF VIOLENT POLYGAMY ARE UNABLE TO ENGAGE IN NORMAL SOCIAL BEHAVIOR, NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND
“Our initial thought was that low-income children growing up alongside more affluent neighbors would do better than their peers growing up in concentrations of poverty,” says Odgers. “What we found was really surprising: The low-income boys who grew up in more affluent neighborhoods actually engage in more anti-social behavior than their peers living in very high-poverty neighborhoods.”
>